public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber•org>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks•com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks•com>,
	"netdev@vger•kernel.org" <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks•com>,
	jkbs@redhat•com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google•com>,
	Peter Christensen <pch@ordbogen•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: ipv4: add support for ECMP hash policy choice
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:27:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170314162715.141f1d4b@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJieiUgQpOidyE-OH73QQpMcQnzEgd+9bGPOKA-yAaFtb3fcwQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 15:38:40 -0700
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks•com> wrote:

> >> >> > That's what my initial version did, but this was discussed during NetConf in Seville
> >> >> > and it was decided that it's best to make a global sysctl, thus the change.  
> >> >>
> >> >> Correct, we discussed this, and we all agreed to only have a sysctl for now.  
> >> >
> >> > Why? If you are going to have private discussions please post the rationale
> >> > in public.  
> >>
> >> Stephen, is there any reason to have a per ecmp route multipath algo
> >> selection ?.
> >> All platforms have a global multipath selection algo. I also don't see
> >> routing daemons ready or willing to specify a per ecmp route multipath
> >> selection algo attribute.  
> >
> > There is no compelling reason to make the attribute per route. But the
> > issue is more that configuration through sysctl's is problematic. It doesn't
> > fit into the standard API paradigm. Sysctl's are like routing patches not
> > part of the real CLI. Trying to trap sysctl's for things like switchedev
> > offload is particularly problematic. I can see the case for either way,
> > and don't have a fixed opinion.  
> 
> ok. understand the switchdev offload part. It was that way in the past...but
> today you can listen to sysctl updates on the netconf netlink channel.
> it works pretty well.

Is there another patch to add the NETCONFA_ECMP support?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-14 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-06 14:59 [PATCH net-next] net: ipv4: add support for ECMP hash policy choice Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-06 16:24 ` David Ahern
2017-03-06 16:52   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-07  6:16 ` Roopa Prabhu
2017-03-07 11:01 ` [PATCH net-next v2] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-08 12:05   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2017-03-08 12:43     ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-08 16:00       ` Jakub Sitnicki
2017-03-13  2:23         ` David Miller
2017-03-14 15:36   ` [PATCH net-next v3] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-14 15:55     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-14 15:58       ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-14 18:48         ` David Miller
2017-03-14 20:25           ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-14 21:10             ` Roopa Prabhu
2017-03-14 21:42               ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-14 22:38                 ` Roopa Prabhu
2017-03-14 23:27                   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2017-03-14 23:45                     ` David Ahern
2017-03-15  9:17                       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2017-03-15 10:46                         ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-15 11:18                           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2017-03-15 11:27                             ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-15 15:01                         ` David Ahern
2017-03-15 15:20                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-15  0:24             ` David Miller
2017-03-15  2:30               ` Tom Herbert
2017-03-17  3:36                 ` David Miller
2017-03-14 18:55     ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-15 11:32     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2017-03-15 12:10       ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-16 13:28   ` [PATCH net-next v4] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-16 16:41     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-16 16:49       ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-17 10:06         ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-03-21 22:28     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170314162715.141f1d4b@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber$(echo .)org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jkbs@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=pch@ordbogen$(echo .)com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox