Subject: [PATCH v2] xfrm: branchless addr4_match() on 64-bit

From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 19:41:17 +0300

Current addr4_match() code has special test for /0 prefixes because of
standard required undefined behaviour. However, it is possible to omit
it on 64-bit because shifting can be done within a 64-bit register and
then truncated to the expected value (which is 0 mask).

Implicit truncation by htonl() fits nicely into R32-within-R64 model
on x86-64.

Space savings: none (coincidence)
Branch savings: 1

Before:

	movzx  eax,BYTE PTR [rdi+0x2a]		# ->prefixlen_d
	test   al,al
	jne    xfrm_selector_match + 0x23f
		...
	movzx  eax,BYTE PTR [rbx+0x2b]		# ->prefixlen_s
	test   al,al
	je     xfrm_selector_match + 0x1c7

After (no branches):

	mov    r8d,0x20
	mov    rdx,0xffffffffffffffff
	mov    esi,DWORD PTR [rsi+0x2c]
	mov    ecx,r8d
	sub    cl,BYTE PTR [rdi+0x2a]
	xor    esi,DWORD PTR [rbx]
	mov    rdi,rdx
	xor    eax,eax
	shl    rdi,cl
	bswap  edi

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email-masked]>
---

 include/net/xfrm.h |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -845,9 +845,9 @@ static inline bool addr_match(const void *token1, const void *token2,
 static inline bool addr4_match(__be32 a1, __be32 a2, u8 prefixlen)
 {
 	/* C99 6.5.7 (3): u32 << 32 is undefined behaviour */
-	if (prefixlen == 0)
+	if (sizeof(long) == 4 && prefixlen == 0)
 		return true;
-	return !((a1 ^ a2) & htonl(0xFFFFFFFFu << (32 - prefixlen)));
+	return !((a1 ^ a2) & htonl(~0UL << (32 - prefixlen)));
 }
 
 static __inline__