public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox•com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail•com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli•us>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, davem@davemloft•net, mlxsw@mellanox•com,
	roopa@cumulusnetworks•com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks•com,
	kafai@fb•com, hannes@stressinduktion•org,
	yoshfuji@linux-ipv6•org, edumazet@google•com,
	yanhaishuang@cmss•chinamobile.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 10/17] ipv6: fib: Add offload indication to routes
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 18:49:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170719154920.GA6078@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21bdef55-9cd2-8a17-9eaa-a10cfc6ef4d4@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:27:30AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/19/17 1:02 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Allow user space applications to see which routes are offloaded and
> > which aren't by setting the RTNH_F_OFFLOAD flag when dumping them.
> > 
> > To be consistent with IPv4, a multipath route is marked as offloaded if
> > one of its nexthops is offloaded. Individual nexthops aren't marked with
> > the 'offload' flag.
> 
> It is more user friendly to report the offload per nexthop especially
> given the implications. There are already flags per nexthop and those
> flags are pushed to userspace so not an API change at all.

I thought about it, but then just decided to be consistent with IPv4.

I can send a follow-up patchset that aligns both families to the
behavior you requested. Need to teach iproute2 to look for
RTNH_F_OFFLOAD in rtnh_flags as well.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-19 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-19  7:02 [patch net-next 00/17] mlxsw: Support for IPv6 UC router Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 01/17] net: core: Make the FIB notification chain generic Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19 14:11   ` David Ahern
2017-07-19 14:35     ` Ido Schimmel
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 02/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Ignore address families other than IPv4 Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 03/17] rocker: " Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 04/17] net: fib_rules: Implement notification logic in core Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 05/17] ipv6: fib_rules: Check if rule is a default rule Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 06/17] ipv6: fib: Add FIB notifiers callbacks Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 07/17] ipv6: fib: Add in-kernel notifications for route add / delete Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19 15:38   ` David Ahern
2017-07-19 15:53     ` Ido Schimmel
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 08/17] ipv6: fib_rules: Dump rules during registration to FIB chain Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 09/17] ipv6: fib: Dump tables " Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 10/17] ipv6: fib: Add offload indication to routes Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19 15:27   ` David Ahern
2017-07-19 15:49     ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2017-07-19 15:53       ` David Ahern
2017-07-19 16:19         ` Ido Schimmel
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 11/17] ipv6: fib: Allow non-FIB users to take reference on route Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19 15:49   ` David Ahern
2017-07-19 16:17     ` Ido Schimmel
2017-07-19 16:29       ` David Ahern
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 12/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Demultiplex FIB event based on family Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 13/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Sanitize IPv6 FIB rules Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 14/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for IPv6 routes addition / deletion Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19 16:14   ` David Ahern
2017-07-19 16:30     ` Ido Schimmel
2017-07-19 16:36       ` David Ahern
2017-07-19 16:43         ` Ido Schimmel
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 15/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for route replace Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 16/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Abort on source-specific routes Jiri Pirko
2017-07-19 16:16   ` David Ahern
2017-07-19 16:36     ` Ido Schimmel
2017-07-19  7:02 ` [patch net-next 17/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Don't ignore IPv6 notifications Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170719154920.GA6078@splinter \
    --to=idosch@mellanox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion$(echo .)org \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
    --cc=kafai@fb$(echo .)com \
    --cc=mlxsw@mellanox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=yanhaishuang@cmss$(echo .)chinamobile.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox