Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] tty/bcm63xx_uart: allow naming clock in device tree

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:17:15 +0200

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:01:32PM +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 2 August 2017 at 11:34, Jonas Gorski <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > Codify using a named clock for the refclk of the uart. This makes it
> > easier if we might need to add a gating clock (like present on the
> > BCM6345).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <[email-masked]>
> 
> Could I please get a (N)Ack so Ralf can add this patch to his tree?
> 
> 
> Regards
> Jonas
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/brcm,bcm6345-uart.txt | 6 ++++++
> >  drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c                              | 6 ++++--
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/brcm,bcm6345-uart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/brcm,bcm6345-uart.txt
> > index 5c52e5eef16d..8b2b0460259a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/brcm,bcm6345-uart.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/brcm,bcm6345-uart.txt
> > @@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ Required properties:
> >  - clocks: Clock driving the hardware; used to figure out the baud rate
> >    divisor.
> >
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +
> > +- clock-names: Should be "refclk".
> > +
> >  Example:
> >
> >         uart0: serial@14e00520 {
> > @@ -19,6 +24,7 @@ Example:
> >                 interrupt-parent = <&periph_intc>;
> >                 interrupts = <2>;
> >                 clocks = <&periph_clk>;
> > +               clock-names = "refclk";
> >         };
> >
> >         clocks {

I don't ack devtree changes :)

> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c
> > index a2b9376ec861..f227eff28d3a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c
> > @@ -841,8 +841,10 @@ static int bcm_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >         if (!res_irq)
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >
> > -       clk = pdev->dev.of_node ? of_clk_get(pdev->dev.of_node, 0) :
> > -                                 clk_get(&pdev->dev, "refclk");
> > +       clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "refclk");
> > +       if (IS_ERR(clk) && pdev->dev.of_node)
> > +               clk = of_clk_get(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> > +
> >         if (IS_ERR(clk))
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >

This part is fine with me:

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>