Subject: Re: hung task in mac80211

From: Stefano Brivio <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:40:57 +0200

On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 15:30:10 +0200
Johannes Berg <[email-masked]> wrote:

> So for example replacing the loop of tid = 0..NUM_TIDS-1 with a
> list_for_each_entry() would already be unsafe with the dropping if the
> list were to require the mutex for locking.

Sure. Still, it would need another code change to break, but in general
I do agree indeed. :)

--
Stefano