public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel•org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox•net>
Cc: Gianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail•com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel•org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Linux Networking Development Mailing List
	<netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	yhs@fb•com
Subject: Re: len = bpf_probe_read_str(); bpf_perf_event_output(... len) == FAIL
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:58:19 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171114145819.GQ8836@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e92da165-b99d-b552-12f5-06f33e857841@iogearbox.net>

Em Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:19:51PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> On 11/14/2017 02:42 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 02:09:34PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> >> On 11/14/2017 01:58 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> Currently having a version compiled from the git tree:

> >> # llc --version
> >> LLVM (http://llvm.org/):
> >>   LLVM version 6.0.0git-2d810c2
> >>   Optimized build.
> >>   Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> >>   Host CPU: skylake

> > [root@jouet bpf]# llc --version
> > LLVM (http://llvm.org/):
> >   LLVM version 4.0.0svn

> > Old stuff! ;-) Will change, but improving these messages should be on
> > the radar, I think :-)

> Yep, agree, I think we need a generic, better solution for this type of
> issue instead of converting individual helpers to handle 0 min bound and
> then only bailing out in such case; need to brainstorm a bit on that.
 
> I think for the above in your case ...
 
>  [...]
>   6: (85) call bpf_probe_read_str#45
>   7: (bf) r1 = r0
>   8: (67) r1 <<= 32
>   9: (77) r1 >>= 32
>  10: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+10
>   R0=inv(id=0) R1=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
>  11: (57) r0 &= 127
>  [...]
 
> ... the shifts on r1 might be due to using 32 bit type, so if you find
> a way to avoid these and have the test on r0 directly, we might get there.
> Perhaps keep using a 64 bit type to avoid them. It would be useful to
> propagate the deduced bound information back to r0 when we know that
> neither r0 nor r1 has changed in the meantime.

I changed len/ret to u64, didn't help, updating clang and llvm to see if
that helps...

Will end up working directly with eBPF bytecode, which is what I really
need in 'perf trace', but lets get this sorted out first.

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-14 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-13 14:30 len = bpf_probe_read_str(); bpf_perf_event_output(... len) == FAIL Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-11-13 14:56 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-11-13 15:08   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-11-14  0:09     ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-11-14 12:58       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-11-14 13:09         ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-11-14 13:42           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-11-14 14:19             ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-11-14 14:58               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2017-11-14 18:15               ` Yonghong Song
2017-11-14 20:25                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-11-14 22:58                   ` Yonghong Song
2017-11-21 14:29                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-11-21 22:31                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-11-22 18:42                         ` Gianluca Borello
2018-01-22 15:06                           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-22 18:28                             ` Yonghong Song
2018-01-22 20:52                               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-11-20 13:31                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-11-20 16:47                     ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171114145819.GQ8836@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=ast@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=g.borello@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox