From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl•cc>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome•com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
netdev@vger•kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome•com,
daniel@iogearbox•net, alexei.starovoitov@gmail•com,
jiri@resnulli•us, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail•net>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 4/6] netdevsim: add software driver for testing offloads
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:55:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171128145530.GA23377@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171127114249.111b1825@cakuba.netronome.com>
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:42:49AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:30:26 +0900 (KST), David Miller wrote:
> > From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome•com>
> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:36:11 -0800
> >
> > > The dummy driver have previously been extended to test SR-IOV,
> > > but the general consensus seems to be against adding further
> > > features to it.
> >
> > I guess this is fine, but then is it going to be the case that
> > every time we want to add a software offload implementation for
> > testing driver paths we add yet another dummy driver?
>
> I would expect others to extend the netdevsim driver, so all test/SW
> implementation would live there.
>
> I was considering moving the SR-IOV code over, too, but I'm worried
> I will break existing tests. Phil, Sabrina would you be OK with that?
Yes, that's fine with us!
Thanks, Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-24 2:36 [RFC net-next 0/6] xdp: make stack perform remove and tests Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 1/6] net: xdp: avoid output parameters when querying XDP prog Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 2/6] net: xdp: report flags program was installed with on query Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 3/6] net: xdp: make the stack take care of the tear down Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 23:24 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-11-25 3:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 4/6] netdevsim: add software driver for testing offloads Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 7:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-11-24 7:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 8:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-11-27 19:30 ` David Miller
2017-11-27 19:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-28 14:55 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2017-11-28 16:20 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 5/6] netdevsim: add bpf offload support Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: add offload test based on netdevsim Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 7:45 ` [RFC net-next 0/6] xdp: make stack perform remove and tests Jiri Pirko
2017-11-24 8:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-25 4:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-26 1:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-11-26 1:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-26 7:43 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171128145530.GA23377@orbyte.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl$(echo .)cc \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome$(echo .)com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome$(echo .)com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail$(echo .)net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox