From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn•com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit•edu>, David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
gnomes@lxorguk•ukuu.org.uk, keescook@chromium•org,
mcgrof@kernel•org, tixxdz@gmail•com, luto@kernel•org,
akpm@linux-foundation•org, james.l.morris@oracle•com,
ben.hutchings@codethink•co.uk, solar@openwall•com,
serge@hallyn•com, jeyu@kernel•org, rusty@rustcorp•com.au,
linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger•kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists•openwall.com, corbet@lwn•net,
mingo@kernel•org, netdev@vger•kernel.org, peterz@infradead•org,
torvalds@linux-foundation•org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 next 1/5] modules:capabilities: add request_module_cap()
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:28:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171129172852.GA14545@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129155406.i2lyclquj75lvtn4@thunk.org>
Quoting Theodore Ts'o (tytso@mit•edu):
> Half the problem here is that with containers, people are changing the
> security model, because they want to let untrusted users have "root",
> without really having "root". Part of the fundamental problem is that
> there are some well-meaning, but fundamentally misguided people, who
> have been asserting: "Containers are just as secure as VM's".
>
> Well, they are not. And the sooner people get past this, the better
> off they'll be....
Just to be clear, module loading requires - and must always continue to
require - CAP_SYS_MODULE against the initial user namespace. Containers
in user namespaces do not have that.
I don't believe anyone has ever claimed that containers which are not in
a user namespace are in any way secure.
(And as for the other claim, I'd prefer to stick to "VMs are in most
cases as insecure as properly configured containers" :)
-serge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-27 17:18 [PATCH v5 next 0/5] Improve Module autoloading infrastructure Djalal Harouni
2017-11-27 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 next 1/5] modules:capabilities: add request_module_cap() Djalal Harouni
2017-11-27 18:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2017-11-27 21:35 ` Djalal Harouni
2017-11-28 19:14 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-11-28 20:11 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-28 21:16 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-11-28 21:33 ` Djalal Harouni
2017-11-28 22:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-11-28 22:52 ` Djalal Harouni
2017-11-28 21:39 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-28 22:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-11-28 22:18 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-28 22:48 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-11-29 7:49 ` Michal Kubecek
2017-11-29 13:46 ` Alan Cox
2017-11-29 14:50 ` David Miller
2017-11-29 15:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-29 15:58 ` David Miller
2017-11-29 16:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-29 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-30 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-29 17:28 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2017-11-30 0:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-30 17:17 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-11-28 20:18 ` Djalal Harouni
2017-11-27 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 next 2/5] modules:capabilities: add cap_kernel_module_request() permission check Djalal Harouni
2017-11-30 2:05 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-11-27 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 next 3/5] modules:capabilities: automatic module loading restriction Djalal Harouni
2017-11-30 1:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-11-30 12:22 ` Djalal Harouni
2017-11-27 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 next 4/5] modules:capabilities: add a per-task modules auto-load mode Djalal Harouni
2017-11-27 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 next 5/5] net: modules: use request_module_cap() to load 'netdev-%s' modules Djalal Harouni
2017-11-27 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-27 21:41 ` Djalal Harouni
2017-11-27 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-27 22:59 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-27 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-27 23:19 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-27 23:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-28 1:23 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-27 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 next 0/5] Improve Module autoloading infrastructure Linus Torvalds
2017-11-27 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-27 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-27 21:31 ` Djalal Harouni
2017-11-27 19:14 ` David Miller
2017-11-27 22:31 ` James Morris
2017-11-27 23:04 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-27 23:44 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171129172852.GA14545@mail.hallyn.com \
--to=serge@hallyn$(echo .)com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=ben.hutchings@codethink$(echo .)co.uk \
--cc=corbet@lwn$(echo .)net \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk$(echo .)ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle$(echo .)com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=keescook@chromium$(echo .)org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists$(echo .)openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=mingo@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp$(echo .)com.au \
--cc=solar@openwall$(echo .)com \
--cc=tixxdz@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=tytso@mit$(echo .)edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox