Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/20] net: hns3: Modify the update period of packet statistics

From: Andrew Lunn <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 16:49:13 +0100

> >Is it because the static void is on the previous line?
> Yes, it is because the static void is on the previous line.
> 
> I can add one patch to fix the  previous line ,  and this patch will correct
> automatically.
> 
> do it need V2 patchset? or push a new patch after this patchset?

Thanks for looking into this. This actually seems like a patch bug,
but i think the consensus is to have the function type on the same
line as the function name within Linux.

No need for a v2. Just send followup patches.

   Andrew