Subject: Re: [bpf-next V4 PATCH 3/8] xdp: add tracepoint for devmap like cpumap have

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 17:04:53 +0200

On Wed, 23 May 2018 07:24:03 -0700
John Fastabend <[email-masked]> wrote:

> > @@ -219,8 +221,8 @@ void __dev_map_insert_ctx(struct bpf_map *map, u32 bit)
> >  static int bq_xmit_all(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *obj,
> >  			 struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned int processed = 0, drops = 0;
> >  	struct net_device *dev = obj->dev;
> > +	int sent = 0, drops = 0;
> >  	int i;
> >  
> >  	if (unlikely(!bq->count))
> > @@ -241,10 +243,13 @@ static int bq_xmit_all(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *obj,
> >  			drops++;
> >  			xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> >  		}
> > -		processed++;
> > +		sent++;  
> 
> Do 'dropped' frames also get counted as 'sent' frames? This seems a bit
> counter-intuitive to me. Should it be 'drops+sent = total frames'
> instead?

Again, sorry for mixing this up when spliting up the patch.  The
patchset does end up with: 'drops+sent = total frames'.  (The
"processed" counter is a copy-paste of code from cpumap, which have
another semantics).  I'll clean it up in V5, to help reviewers.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer