public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer via iovisor-dev <iovisor-dev-9jONkmmOlFHEE9lA1F8Ukti2O/JbrIOy@public•gmane.org>
To: iovisor-dev
	<iovisor-dev-9jONkmmOlFHEE9lA1F8Ukti2O/JbrIOy@public•gmane.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann
	<borkmann-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public•gmane.org>
Cc: "netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public•gmane.org"
	<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public•gmane.org>
Subject: Re: bpf_redirect_map not working after tail call
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 13:04:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180604130435.27d29431@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <319a775a-4913-1e58-c0dd-f3d6e3f56d9e-8RLafaVCWuNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>


On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:15:58 +0200
Sebastiano Miano via iovisor-dev <iovisor-dev-9jONkmmOlFHEE9lA1F8Ukti2O/JbrIOy@public•gmane.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> We have noticed that the bpf_redirect_map returns an error when it is
> called after a tail call.
> The xdp_redirect_map program (under sample/bpf) works fine, but if we
> modify it as shown in the following diff, it doesn't work anymore.
> I have debugged it with the xdp_monitor application and the error
> returned is EFAULT.
> Is this a known issue? Am I doing something wrong?

Argh, this is likely an issue/bug due to the check xdp_map_invalid(),
that was introduced in commit 7c3001313396 ("bpf: fix ri->map_owner
pointer on bpf_prog_realloc").

To Daniel, I don't know how to solve this, could you give some advice?



 static inline bool xdp_map_invalid(const struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
				   unsigned long aux)
 {
	return (unsigned long)xdp_prog->aux != aux;
 }

 static int xdp_do_redirect_map(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
			       struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog)
 {
	struct redirect_info *ri = this_cpu_ptr(&redirect_info);
	unsigned long map_owner = ri->map_owner;
	struct bpf_map *map = ri->map;
	u32 index = ri->ifindex;
	void *fwd = NULL;
	int err;

	[...]
	if (unlikely(xdp_map_invalid(xdp_prog, map_owner))) {
		err = -EFAULT;
		map = NULL;
		goto err;
	}
	[...]


> P.S. I have tested the program with the latest bpf-next kernel.
> 
> ------------
> 
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_kern.c
> b/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_kern.c
> index 740a529..bf1275a 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_kern.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_kern.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,13 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") rxcnt = {
>  	.max_entries = 1,
>  };
> 
> +struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") prog_table = {
> +	.type 		= BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY,
> +	.key_size = sizeof(int),
> +	.value_size = sizeof(int),
> +	.max_entries = 32,
> +};
> +
>  static void swap_src_dst_mac(void *data)
>  {
>  	unsigned short *p = data;
> @@ -89,4 +96,15 @@ int xdp_redirect_dummy_prog(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>  	return XDP_PASS;
>  }
> 
> +/* Entry point */
> +SEC("xdp_redirect_entry_point")
> +int xdp_redirect_entry_point_prog(struct xdp_md *ctx)
> +{
> +	//char fmt[] = "xdp_redirect_entry_point\n";
> +	//bpf_trace_printk(fmt, sizeof(fmt));
> +	bpf_tail_call(ctx, &prog_table, 0);
> +	// Tail call failed
> +	return XDP_DROP;
> +}
> +
>  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_user.c
> b/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_user.c
> index 4445e76..b2d2059 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_user.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		return 1;
>  	}
> 
> -	if (bpf_set_link_xdp_fd(ifindex_in, prog_fd[0], xdp_flags) < 0) {
> +	ret = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd[2], &key, &prog_fd[0], 0);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		perror("bpf_update_elem");
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (bpf_set_link_xdp_fd(ifindex_in, prog_fd[2], xdp_flags) < 0) {
>  		printf("ERROR: link set xdp fd failed on %d\n", ifindex_in);
>  		return 1;
>  	}
> _______________________________________________
> iovisor-dev mailing list
> iovisor-dev-9jONkmmOlFHEE9lA1F8Ukti2O/JbrIOy@public•gmane.org
> https://lists.iovisor.org/mailman/listinfo/iovisor-dev



-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

       reply	other threads:[~2018-06-04 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <319a775a-4913-1e58-c0dd-f3d6e3f56d9e@polito.it>
     [not found] ` <319a775a-4913-1e58-c0dd-f3d6e3f56d9e-8RLafaVCWuNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2018-06-04 11:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer via iovisor-dev [this message]
     [not found]     ` <20180604130435.27d29431-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-06-04 12:21       ` bpf_redirect_map not working after tail call Daniel Borkmann via iovisor-dev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180604130435.27d29431@redhat.com \
    --to=iovisor-dev-9jonkmmolfhee9la1f8ukti2o/jbrioy@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=borkmann-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=brouer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox