Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] bpf: btf: print bpftool map data with btf

From: Okash Khawaja <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 22:35:51 +0100

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:49:01PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 07/12/2018 05:30 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 20:08:03 -0700, Okash Khawaja wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here are the changes from v4:
> >>
> >> patch 2:
> >>
> >> - sort headers in btf_dumper.c
> >> - remove extra parentheses
> >> - include asm/byteorder.h
> >> - compile error when big and small endian bitfields macro undefined
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email-masked]>
> 
> Hmm, strange, by accident I just noticed that only your bpf fix ever made
> it to patchwork, Okash.
> 
>   https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_project_netdev_list_-3Fsubmitter-3D74458-26state-3D-2A&d=DwICaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=4wHrS7MHHFLZe_WCJwRVhA&m=wkiBQFYWPyiN9WONHLY0WiZxcOwNRhXaMMLIE551mCA&s=RggQzClRdkwawboGLPgPXHOdUtYffxeOwlcBlFru-P4&e=
> 
> Potentially because you've sent with attachments which got dropped on
> the list?
interesting because i send all patches using quilt mail, the same way i
sent bpf fix. i can try git-send-email.

also i dropped Acked-by as i changed patch versions. is it common thing
to do? or should i keep the Acked-by?

> 
> Could you properly submit the series again, and retaining Jakub's Reviewed-by
> tag to the patches?
> 
> Thanks,
> Daniel