Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: cpsw: Document cpsw-phy-sel usage but prefer phandle

From: Andrew Lunn <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 03:18:49 +0200

> In the long run cpsw should be really treated as an
> interconnect instance with it's control module providing
> standard Linux framework services such as clock /
> regulator / phy / pinctrl / iio whatever for the other
> modules.

Some of us have been applying pressure for a new driver. This sounds
like another argument for such a re-write.

	   Andrew