public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel•org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail•com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel•org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>,
	daniel@iogearbox•net, netdev@vger•kernel.org, kernel-team@fb•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: emit RECORD_MMAP events for bpf prog load/unload
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:55:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180921135502.GC24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180921122500.GA17312@kernel.org>

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 09:25:00AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > I consider synthetic perf events to be non-ABI. Meaning they're
> > emitted by perf user space into perf.data and there is a convention
> > on names, but it's not a kernel abi. Like RECORD_MMAP with
> > event.filename == "[module_name]" is an indication for perf report
> > to parse elf/build-id of dso==module_name.
> > There is no such support in the kernel. Kernel doesn't emit
> > such events for module load/unload. If in the future
> > we decide to extend kernel with such events they don't have
> > to match what user space perf does today.
> 
> Right, that is another unfortunate state of affairs, kernel module
> load/unload should already be supported, reported by the kernel via a
> proper PERF_RECORD_MODULE_LOAD/UNLOAD

Just wondering, is anyone actually doing enough module loading for this
to matter? (asks the CONFIG_MODULES=n guy).

I thought that was all a relatively static affair; you boot, you get
loadead a few modules for present hardware, the end.

Anyway, no real objection, just wonder if it's worth it.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-21 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-19 22:39 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] perf, bpf: reveal invisible bpf programs Alexei Starovoitov
2018-09-19 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] perf/core: introduce perf_event_mmap_bpf_prog Alexei Starovoitov
2018-09-19 23:30   ` Song Liu
2018-09-20  0:53     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-09-19 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: emit RECORD_MMAP events for bpf prog load/unload Alexei Starovoitov
2018-09-19 23:44   ` Song Liu
2018-09-20  0:59     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-09-20  5:48       ` Song Liu
2018-09-20  8:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-20 13:25     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-09-20 13:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-21  3:14         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-09-21 12:25           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-09-21 13:55             ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-09-21 13:59             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-21 22:13             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-10-15 23:33               ` Song Liu
2018-10-16 23:43                 ` David Ahern
2018-10-17  6:43                   ` Song Liu
2018-10-17 12:11                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-17 12:50                       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-17 16:06                         ` Song Liu
2018-11-02  1:08                       ` Song Liu
2018-10-17 15:09                     ` David Ahern
2018-10-17 16:18                       ` Song Liu
2018-10-17 16:36                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-10-17 18:53                         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-17 19:08                           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-10-17 21:31                             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-17 22:01                               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-09-20 13:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-19 22:39 ` [PATCH perf 3/3] tools/perf: recognize and process RECORD_MMAP events for bpf progs Alexei Starovoitov
2018-09-20 13:36   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-09-20 14:05     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-09-21 22:57   ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180921135502.GC24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=acme@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ast@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox