Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/10] samples/bpf: extend test_cgrp2_attach2 test to use per-cpu cgroup storage

From: Roman Gushchin <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:21:13 +0100

This commit extends the test_cgrp2_attach2 test to cover per-cpu
cgroup storage. Bpf program will use shared and per-cpu cgroup
storages simultaneously, so a better coverage of corresponding
core code will be achieved.

Expected output:
  $ ./test_cgrp2_attach2
  Attached DROP prog. This ping in cgroup /foo should fail...
  ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
  Attached DROP prog. This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should fail...
  ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
  Attached PASS prog. This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should pass...
  Detached PASS from /foo/bar while DROP is attached to /foo.
  This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should fail...
  ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
  Attached PASS from /foo/bar and detached DROP from /foo.
  This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should pass...
  ### override:PASS
  ### multi:PASS

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <[email-masked]>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email-masked]>
---
 samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach2.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach2.c b/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach2.c
index 180f9d813bca..d7b68ef5ba79 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach2.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach2.c
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static int map_fd = -1;
 
 static int prog_load_cnt(int verdict, int val)
 {
-	int cgroup_storage_fd;
+	int cgroup_storage_fd, percpu_cgroup_storage_fd;
 
 	if (map_fd < 0)
 		map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 8, 1, 0);
@@ -225,6 +225,14 @@ static int prog_load_cnt(int verdict, int val)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+	percpu_cgroup_storage_fd = bpf_create_map(
+		BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE,
+		sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key), 8, 0, 0);
+	if (percpu_cgroup_storage_fd < 0) {
+		printf("failed to create map '%s'\n", strerror(errno));
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	struct bpf_insn prog[] = {
 		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -4), /* *(u32 *)(fp - 4) = r0 */
@@ -235,11 +243,20 @@ static int prog_load_cnt(int verdict, int val)
 		BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, val), /* r1 = 1 */
 		BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0), /* xadd r0 += r1 */
+
 		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, cgroup_storage_fd),
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
 		BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage),
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, val),
 		BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0),
+
+		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, percpu_cgroup_storage_fd),
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
+		BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage),
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 0x1),
+		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0),
+
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, verdict), /* r0 = verdict */
 		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 	};
-- 
2.17.1