Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] mv88e6xxx DSA suspend to RAM support

From: Andrew Lunn <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 22:46:52 +0100

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 01:22:50PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Miquel Raynal <[email-masked]>
> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:55:05 +0100
> 
> > After a first attempt of bringing S2RAM support to the DSA switch, it
> > has been reported that a part of the configuration was lost during the
> > cycle. This second version adds a first patch that saves the rules in
> > a per-chip list when they are applied, so that in the second patch we
> > bring S2RAM support by also re-applying these rules.
>  ...
> 
> It seems like the discussion on patch #1 has hit a brick wall.
> 
> The last suggestion was to use:
> 
> +       switch (mode) {
> +       case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX:
> +               phydev->speed = SPEED_2500;
> +               break;
> +       case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR:
> +               phydev->speed = SPEED_10000;
> +               break;
> +
> 
> in dsa_port_fixed_link_register_of(), but that doesn't work
> because swphy will fail without speed=1000 in the dts.
> 
> Well, whatever is decided, the commit message need to be updated
> to explain why this course of action for the most immediate fix
> was ultimately taken.

Hi David

Err. 

I think you are replying to the wrong patch? This comment fits to

https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg546662.html

Although i don't like it, i think for the moment we are going to have
to accept the proposed fix.

	Andrew