public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch>
To: hancock@sedsystems•ca
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail•com>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: Ensure scheduled work is cancelled during removal
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 17:46:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190601154636.GA19081@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8fc39ed123aede7ab23954ba06ff4cd5.squirrel@intranet.sedsystems.ca>

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 09:22:16PM -0600, hancock@sedsystems•ca wrote:
> > On 31.05.2019 22:54, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> It is possible that scheduled work started by the PHY driver is still
> >>> outstanding when phy_device_remove is called if the PHY was initially
> >>> started but never connected, and therefore phy_disconnect is never
> >>> called. phy_stop does not guarantee that the scheduled work is stopped
> >>> because it is called under rtnl_lock. This can cause an oops due to
> >>> use-after-free if the delayed work fires after freeing the PHY device.
> >>>
> > The patch itself at least shouldn't do any harm. However the justification
> > isn't fully convincing yet.
> > PHY drivers don't start any scheduled work. This queue is used by the
> > phylib state machine. phy_stop usually isn't called under rtnl_lock,
> > and it calls phy_stop_machine that cancels pending work.
> > Did you experience such an oops? Can you provide a call chain where
> > your described scenario could happen?
> 
> Upon further investigation, it appears that this change is no longer
> needed in the mainline. Previously (such as in 4.19 kernels as we are
> using),

Hi Robert

Please do all your testing on net-next. 4.19 is dead, in terms of
development. There is no point in developing and testing on it patches
intended for mainline.

     Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-01 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-31 19:15 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: xilinx: add Xilinx PHY driver Robert Hancock
2019-05-31 19:15 ` [PATCH net-next] net: phy: Ensure scheduled work is cancelled during removal Robert Hancock
2019-05-31 20:54   ` Andrew Lunn
2019-05-31 21:26     ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-06-01  3:22       ` hancock
2019-06-01 15:46         ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2019-05-31 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next] net: phy: xilinx: add Xilinx PHY driver Andrew Lunn
2019-05-31 21:11 ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190601154636.GA19081@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn$(echo .)ch \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hancock@sedsystems$(echo .)ca \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox