Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/24] goldish_pipe: rename local pin_user_pages() routine

From: Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:08:31 -0800

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:13:36PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> +static int pin_goldfish_pages(unsigned long first_page,
> +			      unsigned long last_page,
> +			      unsigned int last_page_size,
> +			      int is_write,
> +			      struct page *pages[MAX_BUFFERS_PER_COMMAND],
> +			      unsigned int *iter_last_page_size)

Why not goldfish_pin_pages?  Normally we put the module / subsystem
in front.

Also can we get this queued up for 5.5 to get some trivial changes
out of the way?