Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpftool: Don't crash on missing jited insns or ksyms

From: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:33:02 +0100

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 02:20:11PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]> writes:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:09:55PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Anyhow, I don't suppose it'll hurt to have the Fixes: tag(s) in there;
> >> does Patchwork pick these up (or can you guys do that when you apply
> >> this?), or should I resend?
> >
> > Fixes tags should /always/ be present if possible, since they help to provide
> > more context even if the buggy commit was in bpf-next, for example.
> 
> ACK, will do. Thank you for picking them up for this patch (did you do
> that manually, or is this part of your scripts?)

Manually right now, but if you have some cycles, happy to pick up a patch [0]. :)

  [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dborkman/pw.git/