Subject: [RFC patch 11/19] bpf/tests: Use migrate disable instead of preempt disable

From: Thomas Gleixner <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:39:28 +0100

From: David Miller <[email-masked]>

Replace the preemption disable/enable with migrate_disable/enable() to
reflect the actual requirement and to allow PREEMPT_RT to substitute it
with an actual migration disable mechanism which does not disable
preemption.

[ tglx: Switched it over to migrate disable ]

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email-masked]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email-masked]>

---
 lib/test_bpf.c     |    4 ++--
 net/bpf/test_run.c |    8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -6660,14 +6660,14 @@ static int __run_one(const struct bpf_pr
 	u64 start, finish;
 	int ret = 0, i;
 
-	preempt_disable();
+	migrate_disable();
 	start = ktime_get_ns();
 
 	for (i = 0; i < runs; i++)
 		ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(fp, data);
 
 	finish = ktime_get_ns();
-	preempt_enable();
+	migrate_enable();
 
 	*duration = finish - start;
 	do_div(*duration, runs);
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int bpf_test_run(struct bpf_prog
 		repeat = 1;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	preempt_disable();
+	migrate_disable();
 	time_start = ktime_get_ns();
 	for (i = 0; i < repeat; i++) {
 		bpf_cgroup_storage_set(storage);
@@ -54,18 +54,18 @@ static int bpf_test_run(struct bpf_prog
 
 		if (need_resched()) {
 			time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
-			preempt_enable();
+			migrate_enable();
 			rcu_read_unlock();
 
 			cond_resched();
 
 			rcu_read_lock();
-			preempt_disable();
+			migrate_disable();
 			time_start = ktime_get_ns();
 		}
 	}
 	time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
-	preempt_enable();
+	migrate_enable();
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	do_div(time_spent, repeat);