Subject: [PATCH 11/18] bpf: Rename bpf_tree to bpf_progs_tree

From: Jiri Olsa <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 20:29:58 +0100

Renaming bpf_tree to bpf_progs_tree and bpf_tree_ops
to bpf_progs_tree_ops to better capture the usage of
the tree which is for the bpf_prog objects only.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email-masked]>
---
 kernel/bpf/core.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index a0feba447e5d..2f857bbfe05c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -580,13 +580,14 @@ bpf_get_prog_addr_start(struct latch_tree_node *n)
 	return aux->ksym.start;
 }
 
-static __always_inline bool bpf_tree_less(struct latch_tree_node *a,
-					  struct latch_tree_node *b)
+static __always_inline bool
+bpf_progs_tree_less(struct latch_tree_node *a,
+		    struct latch_tree_node *b)
 {
 	return bpf_get_prog_addr_start(a) < bpf_get_prog_addr_start(b);
 }
 
-static __always_inline int bpf_tree_comp(void *key, struct latch_tree_node *n)
+static __always_inline int bpf_progs_tree_comp(void *key, struct latch_tree_node *n)
 {
 	unsigned long val = (unsigned long)key;
 	const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux;
@@ -601,9 +602,9 @@ static __always_inline int bpf_tree_comp(void *key, struct latch_tree_node *n)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static const struct latch_tree_ops bpf_tree_ops = {
-	.less	= bpf_tree_less,
-	.comp	= bpf_tree_comp,
+static const struct latch_tree_ops bpf_progs_tree_ops = {
+	.less	= bpf_progs_tree_less,
+	.comp	= bpf_progs_tree_comp,
 };
 
 static unsigned long
@@ -646,7 +647,7 @@ static const struct latch_tree_ops bpf_ksym_tree_ops = {
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bpf_lock);
 static LIST_HEAD(bpf_kallsyms);
 static struct latch_tree_root bpf_ksym_tree __cacheline_aligned;
-static struct latch_tree_root bpf_tree __cacheline_aligned;
+static struct latch_tree_root bpf_progs_tree __cacheline_aligned;
 
 static void __bpf_ksym_add(struct bpf_ksym *ksym)
 {
@@ -706,7 +707,8 @@ void bpf_prog_kallsyms_add(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 	bpf_get_prog_name(fp);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&bpf_lock);
-	latch_tree_insert(&fp->aux->ksym_tnode, &bpf_tree, &bpf_tree_ops);
+	latch_tree_insert(&fp->aux->ksym_tnode, &bpf_progs_tree,
+			  &bpf_progs_tree_ops);
 	__bpf_ksym_add(&fp->aux->ksym);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&bpf_lock);
 }
@@ -717,7 +719,8 @@ void bpf_prog_kallsyms_del(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 		return;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&bpf_lock);
-	latch_tree_erase(&fp->aux->ksym_tnode, &bpf_tree, &bpf_tree_ops);
+	latch_tree_erase(&fp->aux->ksym_tnode, &bpf_progs_tree,
+			 &bpf_progs_tree_ops);
 	__bpf_ksym_del(&fp->aux->ksym);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&bpf_lock);
 }
@@ -726,7 +729,8 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_kallsyms_find(unsigned long addr)
 {
 	struct latch_tree_node *n;
 
-	n = latch_tree_find((void *)addr, &bpf_tree, &bpf_tree_ops);
+	n = latch_tree_find((void *)addr, &bpf_progs_tree,
+			    &bpf_progs_tree_ops);
 	return n ?
 	       container_of(n, struct bpf_prog_aux, ksym_tnode)->prog :
 	       NULL;
-- 
2.24.1