Subject: [PATCH] bpf: fix build warning - missing prototype

From: Jean-Philippe Menil <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:08:44 +0100

Fix build warning when building net/bpf/test_run.o with W=1 due
to missing prototype for bpf_fentry_test{1..6}.

These functions are only used in test_run.c so just make them static.
Therefore inline keyword should sit between storage class and type.

Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Menil <[email-masked]>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index d555c0d8657d..c0dcd29f682c 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -113,32 +113,32 @@ static int bpf_test_finish(const union bpf_attr *kattr,
  * architecture dependent calling conventions. 7+ can be supported in the
  * future.
  */
-int noinline bpf_fentry_test1(int a)
+static noinline int bpf_fentry_test1(int a)
 {
 	return a + 1;
 }
 
-int noinline bpf_fentry_test2(int a, u64 b)
+static noinline int bpf_fentry_test2(int a, u64 b)
 {
 	return a + b;
 }
 
-int noinline bpf_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c)
+static noinline int bpf_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c)
 {
 	return a + b + c;
 }
 
-int noinline bpf_fentry_test4(void *a, char b, int c, u64 d)
+static noinline int bpf_fentry_test4(void *a, char b, int c, u64 d)
 {
 	return (long)a + b + c + d;
 }
 
-int noinline bpf_fentry_test5(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, u64 e)
+static noinline int bpf_fentry_test5(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, u64 e)
 {
 	return a + (long)b + c + d + e;
 }
 
-int noinline bpf_fentry_test6(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, u64 f)
+static noinline int bpf_fentry_test6(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, u64 f)
 {
 	return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f;
 }
-- 
2.25.2