Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context

From: Kalle Valo <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:07:04 +0000 (UTC)

Kai-Heng Feng <[email-masked]> wrote:

> It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context.
> 
> Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue.
> 
> Fixes: 6343a6d4b213 ("rtw88: Add delay on polling h2c command status bit")
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email-masked]>

For patch 1 please also CC linux-wireless, otherwise patchwork cannot see it.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11505147/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches