Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context

From: Kalle Valo <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 08:31:33 +0000 (UTC)

Kai-Heng Feng <[email-masked]> wrote:

> It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context.
> 
> Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue.
> 
> Fixes: 6343a6d4b213 ("rtw88: Add delay on polling h2c command status bit")
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email-masked]>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

fd5d781964b0 rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11505147/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches