Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 06/12] bpf: helpers: add multibuffer support

From: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:05:35 +0200

> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:

Hi Alexei,

> > From: Sameeh Jubran <[email-masked]>
> > 
> > The implementation is based on this [0] draft by Jesper D. Brouer.
> > 
> > Provided two new helpers:
> > 
> > * bpf_xdp_get_frag_count()
> > * bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size()
> > 
> > + * int bpf_xdp_get_frag_count(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md)
> > + *	Description
> > + *		Get the number of fragments for a given xdp multi-buffer.
> > + *	Return
> > + *		The number of fragments
> > + *
> > + * int bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md)
> > + *	Description
> > + *		Get the total size of fragments for a given xdp multi-buffer.
> > + *	Return
> > + *		The total size of fragments for a given xdp multi-buffer.
> >   */
> >  #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)		\
> >  	FN(unspec),			\
> > @@ -3737,6 +3749,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
> >  	FN(inode_storage_delete),	\
> >  	FN(d_path),			\
> >  	FN(copy_from_user),		\
> > +	FN(xdp_get_frag_count),		\
> > +	FN(xdp_get_frags_total_size),	\
> >  	/* */
> 
> Please route the set via bpf-next otherwise merge conflicts will be severe.

ack, fine

in bpf-next the following two commits (available in net-next) are currently missing:
- 632bb64f126a: net: mvneta: try to use in-irq pp cache in mvneta_txq_bufs_free
- 879456bedbe5: net: mvneta: avoid possible cache misses in mvneta_rx_swbm

is it ok to rebase bpf-next ontop of net-next in order to post all the series
in bpf-next? Or do you prefer to post mvneta patches in net-next and bpf
related changes in bpf-next when it will rebased ontop of net-next?

Regards,
Lorenzo