Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] mvpp2: recycle buffers

From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 19:20:48 +0100

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 06:58:45PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> index b2259bf1d299..9dceabece56c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> @@ -3847,6 +3847,7 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi,
>  	struct mvpp2_pcpu_stats ps = {};
>  	enum dma_data_direction dma_dir;
>  	struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> +	struct xdp_rxq_info *rxqi;
>  	struct xdp_buff xdp;
>  	int rx_received;
>  	int rx_done = 0;
> @@ -3912,15 +3913,15 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi,
>  		else
>  			frag_size = bm_pool->frag_size;
>  
> +		if (bm_pool->pkt_size == MVPP2_BM_SHORT_PKT_SIZE)
> +			rxqi = &rxq->xdp_rxq_short;
> +		else
> +			rxqi = &rxq->xdp_rxq_long;
>  
> +		if (xdp_prog) {
> +			xdp.rxq = rxqi;
>  
> +			xdp_init_buff(&xdp, PAGE_SIZE, rxqi);
>  			xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp, data,
>  					 MVPP2_MH_SIZE + MVPP2_SKB_HEADROOM,
>  					 rx_bytes, false);
> @@ -3964,7 +3965,7 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi,
>  		}
>  
>  		if (pp)
> +			skb_mark_for_recycle(skb, virt_to_page(data), pp);
>  		else
>  			dma_unmap_single_attrs(dev->dev.parent, dma_addr,
>  					       bm_pool->buf_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE,

Looking at the above, which I've only quoted the _resulting_ code after
your patch above, I don't see why you have moved the
"bm_pool->pkt_size == MVPP2_BM_SHORT_PKT_SIZE" conditional outside of
the test for xdp_prog - I don't see rxqi being used except within that
conditional. Please can you explain the reasoning there?

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!