Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] igc: Export LEDs

From: Marek Behún <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:55:50 +0200

On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:29:27 +0200
Pavel Machek <[email-masked]> wrote:

> So "r8159-0300:green:activity" would be closer to the naming we want,
> but lets not do that, we really want this to be similar to what others
> are doing, and that probably means "ethphy3:green:activity" AFAICT.

Pavel, one point of the discussion is that in this case the LED is
controlled by MAC, not PHY. So the question is whether we want to do
"ethmacN" (in addition to "ethphyN").

Marek