Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix port_hidden_wait to account for port_base_addr

From: Marek Behún <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 19:20:46 +0200

On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 15:31:43 +0000
Nathan Rossi <[email-masked]> wrote:

> The other port_hidden functions rely on the port_read/port_write
> functions to access the hidden control port. These functions apply the
> offset for port_base_addr where applicable. Update port_hidden_wait to
> use the port_wait_bit so that port_base_addr offsets are accounted for
> when waiting for the busy bit to change.
> 
> Without the offset the port_hidden_wait function would timeout on
> devices that have a non-zero port_base_addr (e.g. MV88E6141), however
> devices that have a zero port_base_addr would operate correctly (e.g.
> MV88E6390).
> 
> Fixes: ea89098ef9a5 ("net: dsa: mv88x6xxx: mv88e6390 errata")
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <[email-masked]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add fixes
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port_hidden.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port_hidden.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port_hidden.c
> index b49d05f0e1..7a9f9ff6de 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port_hidden.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port_hidden.c
> @@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ int mv88e6xxx_port_hidden_wait(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
>  {
>  	int bit = __bf_shf(MV88E6XXX_PORT_RESERVED_1A_BUSY);
>  
> -	return mv88e6xxx_wait_bit(chip, MV88E6XXX_PORT_RESERVED_1A_CTRL_PORT,
> -				  MV88E6XXX_PORT_RESERVED_1A, bit, 0);
> +	return mv88e6xxx_port_wait_bit(chip,
> +				       MV88E6XXX_PORT_RESERVED_1A_CTRL_PORT,
> +				       MV88E6XXX_PORT_RESERVED_1A, bit, 0);
>  }
>  
>  int mv88e6xxx_port_hidden_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int block, int port,

Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <[email-masked]>