Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next] sched: multicast sched extack messages

From: Jakub Kicinski <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 11:43:06 -0800

On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:56:00 -0500 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> IMO the feature is useful. The idea of using a single tool to get the
> details improves the operational experience.
> And in this case this is a valid event (someone tried to add an entry to
> hardware and s/ware and it worked for
> one and not the other).
> I think Jakub's objection is in the approach.

Right.

> Jakub, would  using specific attributes restricted to
> just QDISC/FILTER/ACTION work for you?

Yes, specific attr to wrap the extack seems acceptable.