From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org>
To: "Lin Ma" <linma@zju•edu.cn>
Cc: "Nikolay Aleksandrov" <razor@blackwall•org>,
davem@davemloft•net, edumazet@google•com, pabeni@redhat•com,
idosch@nvidia•com, lucien.xin@gmail•com, liuhangbin@gmail•com,
edwin.peer@broadcom•com, jiri@resnulli•us,
md.fahad.iqbal.polash@intel•com,
anirudh.venkataramanan@intel•com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel•com,
neerav.parikh@intel•com, netdev@vger•kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rtnetlink: let rtnl_bridge_setlink checks IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE length
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 08:44:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230726084420.1bf95ef9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7670876b.ea0b8.189912c3a92.Coremail.linma@zju.edu.cn>
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:49:02 +0800 (GMT+08:00) Lin Ma wrote:
> Cool, I agree with Hangbin that another patch which removes the redundant
> checks in driver is needed.
>
> But I have a simple question. I will send this patch to net one and another
> to net-next one. How can I ensure the latter one depends on the former one?
> Or should I send a patch series to net-next that contains the former one :)
> (I currently choose the method 2 and please let me know if I do this wrong)
You'll need to wait for the patch to propagate before posting.
Our trees merge each Thursday, so if you post on Friday the fix
should be in net-next.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-26 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 5:57 [PATCH v2] rtnetlink: let rtnl_bridge_setlink checks IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE length Lin Ma
2023-07-25 7:30 ` Hangbin Liu
2023-07-25 14:30 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-07-26 7:49 ` Lin Ma
2023-07-26 15:44 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-07-27 0:03 ` Lin Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230726084420.1bf95ef9@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=anirudh.venkataramanan@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
--cc=edwin.peer@broadcom$(echo .)com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia$(echo .)com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
--cc=linma@zju$(echo .)edu.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=md.fahad.iqbal.polash@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=neerav.parikh@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=razor@blackwall$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox