Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95 compatible string

From: Rob Herring <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:57:36 -0600

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 07:00:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95 compatible
> > string
> > 
> > On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:26:25 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > > > Add i.MX95 flexcan which is compatible i.MX93 flexcan
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email-masked]>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email-masked]>
> > 
> > Hm, you don't apply CAN DTB patches?
> 
> Nope. I am preparing dt-binding first, then post the i.MX95 SoC
> dtsi. The CAN will be in the i.MX95 SOC dtsi file, not a
> single patch only for CAN node.

The question was why isn't Marc, the CAN maintainer, applying this. I 
have the same question.

Rob