Subject: Re: [RFC] HW TX Rate Limiting Driver API

From: Jakub Kicinski <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:57:54 -0700

On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:25:37 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> I would say just bw_min = 0, all others fields are ignored in such
> case. But not very relevant since...

> ... my understanding is that you have strong preference over the
> 'attach points' variant.
> 
> I think in the end is mostly a matter of clearly define
> expectation/behavior and initial status. 

Agreed, no strong preference but also no strong argument either way?

Maybe my main worry was that we have 4 "lookup modes" if every one
of them have fake nodes that's a bit messy. With fewer modes it's more
palatable.

And IIUC TC uses the magic encoding method, so that's a precedent.