Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] net/dccp: Use min()/max() to simplify the code

From: Simon Horman <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 15:04:30 +0100

On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 03:40:30PM +0800, Hongbo Li wrote:
> Let's use min()/max() to simplify the code and fix the
> Coccinelle/coccicheck warning reported by minmax.cocci.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  net/dccp/ackvec.c | 2 +-
>  net/dccp/dccp.h   | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/dccp/ackvec.c b/net/dccp/ackvec.c
> index 1cba001bb4c8..faadd0190107 100644
> --- a/net/dccp/ackvec.c
> +++ b/net/dccp/ackvec.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ void dccp_ackvec_clear_state(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const u64 ackno)
>  	 * Deal with overlapping Ack Vectors: don't subtract more than the
>  	 * number of packets between tail_ackno and ack_ackno.
>  	 */
> -	eff_runlen = delta < avr->avr_ack_runlen ? delta : avr->avr_ack_runlen;
> +	eff_runlen = min(delta, avr->avr_ack_runlen);

delta is s64, but known to be non-negative
avr->avr_ack_runlen is u8

I _think_ this is a candidate for umin().

>  
>  	runlen_now = dccp_ackvec_runlen(av->av_buf + avr->avr_ack_ptr);
>  	/*
> diff --git a/net/dccp/dccp.h b/net/dccp/dccp.h
> index 1f748ed1279d..872d17fb85b5 100644
> --- a/net/dccp/dccp.h
> +++ b/net/dccp/dccp.h
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static inline u64 dccp_loss_count(const u64 s1, const u64 s2, const u64 ndp)
>  	WARN_ON(delta < 0);
>  	delta -= ndp + 1;
>  
> -	return delta > 0 ? delta : 0;
> +	return max(delta, 0);
>  }

As per my comment on 2/8 [*], I think you should drop this hunk.

[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email-masked]/