Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/3] net: sched: consistently use rcu_replace_pointer() in taprio_change()

From: Simon Horman <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 11:19:15 +0100

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 05:07:07PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> According to Vinicius (and carefully looking through the whole thing
> once again), txtime branch of 'taprio_change()' is not going to race
> against 'advance_sched()'. But using 'rcu_replace_pointer()' in the
> former may be a good idea as well.

Hi Dmitry,

If this is not a fix, then it should be targeted at net-next.
As the other two patches in the series do appear to be fixes,
that means the patch-set should be split into two: one for net
and one for net-next.

Also, please consider including a cover letter with
patch-sets with more than one patch.

> Suggested-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <[email-masked]>
> ---
> v4: adjust subject to target net tree
> v3: unchanged since v2
> v2: added to the series

...