Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: fix overflow inside virtnet_rq_alloc

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 05:08:56 -0400

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 04:53:38PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 04:43:29 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 03:19:13PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > leads to regression on VM with the sysctl value of:
> > >
> > > - net.core.high_order_alloc_disable=1
> > >
> > > which could see reliable crashes or scp failure (scp a file 100M in size
> > > to VM):
> > >
> > > The issue is that the virtnet_rq_dma takes up 16 bytes at the beginning
> > > of a new frag. When the frag size is larger than PAGE_SIZE,
> > > everything is fine. However, if the frag is only one page and the
> > > total size of the buffer and virtnet_rq_dma is larger than one page, an
> > > overflow may occur. In this case, if an overflow is possible, I adjust
> > > the buffer size. If net.core.high_order_alloc_disable=1, the maximum
> > > buffer size is 4096 - 16. If net.core.high_order_alloc_disable=0, only
> > > the first buffer of the frag is affected.
> > >
> > > Fixes: f9dac92ba908 ("virtio_ring: enable premapped mode whatever use_dma_api")
> > > Reported-by: "Si-Wei Liu" <[email-masked]>
> > > Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/all/[email-masked]
> > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <[email-masked]>
> >
> >
> > Guys where are we going with this? We have a crasher right now,
> > if this is not fixed ASAP I'd have to revert a ton of
> > work Xuan Zhuo just did.
> 
> I think this patch can fix it and I tested it.
> But Darren said this patch did not work.
> I need more info about the crash that Darren encountered.
> 
> Thanks.

So what are we doing? Revert the whole pile for now?
Seems to be a bit of a pity, but maybe that's the best we can do
for this release.

> >
> >
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > index c6af18948092..e5286a6da863 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > @@ -918,9 +918,6 @@ static void *virtnet_rq_alloc(struct receive_queue *rq, u32 size, gfp_t gfp)
> > >  	void *buf, *head;
> > >  	dma_addr_t addr;
> > >
> > > -	if (unlikely(!skb_page_frag_refill(size, alloc_frag, gfp)))
> > > -		return NULL;
> > > -
> > >  	head = page_address(alloc_frag->page);
> > >
> > >  	dma = head;
> > > @@ -2421,6 +2418,9 @@ static int add_recvbuf_small(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> > >  	len = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len) +
> > >  	      SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> > >
> > > +	if (unlikely(!skb_page_frag_refill(len, &rq->alloc_frag, gfp)))
> > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > >  	buf = virtnet_rq_alloc(rq, len, gfp);
> > >  	if (unlikely(!buf))
> > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > > @@ -2521,6 +2521,12 @@ static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > >  	 */
> > >  	len = get_mergeable_buf_len(rq, &rq->mrg_avg_pkt_len, room);
> > >
> > > +	if (unlikely(!skb_page_frag_refill(len + room, alloc_frag, gfp)))
> > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!alloc_frag->offset && len + room + sizeof(struct virtnet_rq_dma) > alloc_frag->size)
> > > +		len -= sizeof(struct virtnet_rq_dma);
> > > +
> > >  	buf = virtnet_rq_alloc(rq, len + room, gfp);
> > >  	if (unlikely(!buf))
> > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > > --
> > > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> >