Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: add SA information to the offloaded packet

From: Leon Romanovsky <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:10:51 +0300

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 04:43:55PM -0700, Feng Wang wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> Can you reconsider the revert of the CL? Based on our discussion, I
> believe we've reached a consensus that the xfrm id is necessary. 

It is only half of the consensus, the other half is that upstream
customer should exist.

Thanks