Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 03/12] net-timestamp: reorganize in skb_tstamp_tx_output()

From: Jason Xing <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:06:42 +0800

From: Jason Xing <[email-masked]>

It's a prep for bpf print function later. This patch only put the
original generating logic into one function. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <[email-masked]>
---
My thought is keeping each patch small helps people to review.
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index ab0a59f1e14d..f36eb9daa31a 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -5540,18 +5540,15 @@ void skb_complete_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_complete_tx_timestamp);
 
-void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
-		     const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
-		     struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
-		     struct sock *sk, int tstype)
+static void skb_tstamp_tx_output(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
+				 const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
+				 struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
+				 struct sock *sk, int tstype)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	bool tsonly, opt_stats = false;
 	u32 tsflags;
 
-	if (!sk)
-		return;
-
 	tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags[SOCKETOPT_TS_REQUESTOR]);
 	if (!hwtstamps && !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW) &&
 	    skb_shinfo(orig_skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS)
@@ -5595,6 +5592,17 @@ void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
 
 	__skb_complete_tx_timestamp(skb, sk, tstype, opt_stats);
 }
+
+void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
+		     const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
+		     struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
+		     struct sock *sk, int tstype)
+{
+	if (!sk)
+		return;
+
+	skb_tstamp_tx_output(orig_skb, ack_skb, hwtstamps, sk, tstype);
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__skb_tstamp_tx);
 
 void skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
-- 
2.37.3