public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel•com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft•net>, <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	<edumazet@google•com>, <pabeni@redhat•com>,
	<andrew+netdev@lunn•ch>, <horms@kernel•org>, <sdf@fomichev•me>,
	<hramamurthy@google•com>, <kuniyu@amazon•com>,
	<jdamato@fastly•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 7/8] docs: netdev: break down the instance locking info per ops struct
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:08:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410090802.37207b61@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <119bf05d-17c6-4327-a79b-31e3e2838abe@intel.com>

On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 23:01:18 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> > +All queue management callbacks are invoked while holding the netdev instance
> > +lock. ``rtnl_lock`` may or may not be held.
> > +
> > +Note that supporting struct netdev_queue_mgmt_ops automatically enables
> > +"ops locking".
> > +  
> 
> Does this mean we don't allow drivers which support
> netdev_queue_mgmt_ops but don't set request_ops_lock? Or does it mean
> that supporting netdev_queue_mgmt_ops and/or netdev shapers
> automatically implies request_ops_lock? Or is there some other
> behavioral difference?
> 
> From the wording this sounds like its enforced via code, and it seems
> reasonable to me that we wouldn't allow these without setting
> request_ops_lock to true...

"request" is for drivers to optionally request.
If the driver supports queue or shaper APIs it doesn't have a say.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-08 19:59 [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net: depend on instance lock for queue related netlink ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net: avoid potential race between netdev_get_by_index_lock() and netns switch Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/8] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/8] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/8] xdp: double protect netdev->xdp_flags with netdev->lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 22:15   ` Harshitha Ramamurthy
2025-04-09 18:40   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for xdp features Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-10 17:10   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-11  2:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-11  2:23       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-11 17:41         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-04-11 19:19           ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-11  2:36       ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/8] docs: netdev: break down the instance locking info per ops struct Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-09  2:59   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-10  6:01   ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-10 16:08     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-10 22:35       ` Keller, Jacob E
2025-04-10 23:39         ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-11 21:26           ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for qstats in ops locked drivers Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-10  5:23   ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-10 23:46     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-11 21:29       ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-10  0:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net: depend on instance lock for queue related netlink ops patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250410090802.37207b61@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn$(echo .)ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=horms@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=hramamurthy@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev$(echo .)me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox