Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/nouveau: nouveau_fence: Standardize list iterations

From: Philipp Stanner <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:19:01 +0200

nouveau_fence.c iterates over lists in a non-canonical way. Since the
operations done are just basic for-each-loops, they should be written in
the standard form.

Use for_each_safe() instead of the custom loop iterations.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <[email-masked]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
index 6ded8c2b6d3b..60d961b43488 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
@@ -84,11 +84,12 @@ void
 nouveau_fence_context_kill(struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx, int error)
 {
 	struct nouveau_fence *fence;
+	struct list_head *pos, *tmp;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
-	while (!list_empty(&fctx->pending)) {
-		fence = list_entry(fctx->pending.next, typeof(*fence), head);
+	list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &fctx->pending) {
+		fence = list_entry(pos, struct nouveau_fence, head);
 
 		if (error && !dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(&fence->base))
 			dma_fence_set_error(&fence->base, error);
@@ -131,11 +132,12 @@ static int
 nouveau_fence_update(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx)
 {
 	struct nouveau_fence *fence;
+	struct list_head *pos, *tmp;
 	int drop = 0;
 	u32 seq = fctx->read(chan);
 
-	while (!list_empty(&fctx->pending)) {
-		fence = list_entry(fctx->pending.next, typeof(*fence), head);
+	list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &fctx->pending) {
+		fence = list_entry(pos, struct nouveau_fence, head);
 
 		if ((int)(seq - fence->base.seqno) < 0)
 			break;
-- 
2.48.1