Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] net: mana: Add sched HTB offload support

From: Jakub Kicinski <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:57:23 -0700

On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:27:16 +0000 Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > > We selected tc-htb for our current use case because we plan to support
> > > multiple speed classes in the future.  
> > 
> > Which net-shapers also support.  
> 
> Thanks for pointing that out...
> But for easier usage with existing tc tool for customers, can we still
> use tc-htb offload? Does using tc-htb offload for speed clamping break
> any coding convention or API specs?

The only spec here is that the offloaded version is supposed to look
like the non-offloaded one. I really don't see how you can claim that
static single class HTB is a accurate offload of HTB.