public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel•com>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail•com>, bpf@vger•kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists•linux.dev, netdev@vger•kernel.org,
	alexei.starovoitov@gmail•com, andrii@kernel•org,
	daniel@iogearbox•net, tj@kernel•org, martin.lau@kernel•org,
	ameryhung@gmail•com, kernel-team@meta•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Support associating BPF program with struct_ops
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 00:03:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202510172346.Djfrforq-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251016204503.3203690-3-ameryhung@gmail.com>

Hi Amery,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Amery-Hung/bpf-Allow-verifier-to-fixup-kernel-module-kfuncs/20251017-044703
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251016204503.3203690-3-ameryhung%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Support associating BPF program with struct_ops
config: x86_64-randconfig-161-20251017 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251017/202510172346.Djfrforq-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251017/202510172346.Djfrforq-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel•com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510172346.Djfrforq-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/bpf/core.c: In function 'bpf_prog_free_deferred':
>> kernel/bpf/core.c:2881:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'bpf_struct_ops_put'; did you mean 'bpf_struct_ops_find'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    2881 |                 bpf_struct_ops_put(aux->st_ops_assoc);
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                 bpf_struct_ops_find


vim +2881 kernel/bpf/core.c

  2863	
  2864	static void bpf_prog_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
  2865	{
  2866		struct bpf_prog_aux *aux;
  2867		int i;
  2868	
  2869		aux = container_of(work, struct bpf_prog_aux, work);
  2870	#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
  2871		bpf_free_kfunc_btf_tab(aux->kfunc_btf_tab);
  2872		bpf_prog_stream_free(aux->prog);
  2873	#endif
  2874	#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF
  2875		if (aux->cgroup_atype != CGROUP_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE_INVALID)
  2876			bpf_cgroup_atype_put(aux->cgroup_atype);
  2877	#endif
  2878		bpf_free_used_maps(aux);
  2879		bpf_free_used_btfs(aux);
  2880		if (aux->st_ops_assoc) {
> 2881			bpf_struct_ops_put(aux->st_ops_assoc);
  2882			bpf_prog_disassoc_struct_ops(aux->prog);
  2883		}
  2884		if (bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(aux))
  2885			bpf_prog_dev_bound_destroy(aux->prog);
  2886	#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
  2887		if (aux->prog->has_callchain_buf)
  2888			put_callchain_buffers();
  2889	#endif
  2890		if (aux->dst_trampoline)
  2891			bpf_trampoline_put(aux->dst_trampoline);
  2892		for (i = 0; i < aux->real_func_cnt; i++) {
  2893			/* We can just unlink the subprog poke descriptor table as
  2894			 * it was originally linked to the main program and is also
  2895			 * released along with it.
  2896			 */
  2897			aux->func[i]->aux->poke_tab = NULL;
  2898			bpf_jit_free(aux->func[i]);
  2899		}
  2900		if (aux->real_func_cnt) {
  2901			kfree(aux->func);
  2902			bpf_prog_unlock_free(aux->prog);
  2903		} else {
  2904			bpf_jit_free(aux->prog);
  2905		}
  2906	}
  2907	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-17 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-16 20:44 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/4] Support associating BPF programs with struct_ops Amery Hung
2025-10-16 20:45 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: Allow verifier to fixup kernel module kfuncs Amery Hung
2025-10-16 20:45 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Support associating BPF program with struct_ops Amery Hung
2025-10-16 23:51   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-10-16 23:58     ` Amery Hung
2025-10-17  0:19   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-10-17 16:38     ` Amery Hung
2025-10-17 16:49       ` Amery Hung
2025-10-17 14:18   ` kernel test robot
2025-10-17 16:03   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-10-17 17:05   ` kernel test robot
2025-10-16 20:45 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/4] libbpf: Add bpf_prog_assoc_struct_ops() API Amery Hung
2025-10-16 20:45 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test BPF_PROG_ASSOC_STRUCT_OPS command Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202510172346.Djfrforq-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=bpf@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta$(echo .)com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists$(echo .)linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox