Subject: Re: [net-next,v4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add partial support for TCAM entries

From: Jakub Kicinski <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 16:13:21 -0800

On Mon, 2 Mar 2026 13:36:59 +0000 Cedric Jehasse wrote:
>> I see. But that sounds like a bug / silliness in the core that should
>> be fixed. AFAICT it's due to the fact that the fields are a union and
>> FL_KEY_SET_IF_MASKED() ends up interpreting either being set as both :/  
> 
> Changes to the core would have to be done in a different patch submission? What
> should be done with this patch, wait untill the core has been patched?

Both can we posted in the same patch series.

> There could be drivers unknowingly depend on the current implementation of
> having both bits always set.

Do your best to spot them, otherwise we'll fix them when someone
complains.