Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Unify user-visible "Qualcomm" name

From: Simon Horman <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:27:03 +0100

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 06:28:24PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/04/2026 18:14, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 09:01:27AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Various names for Qualcomm as a company are used in user-visible config
> >> options: QCOM, Qualcomm and Qualcomm Technologies.  Switch to unified
> >> "Qualcomm" so it will be easier for users to identify the options when
> >> for example running menuconfig.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email-masked]>
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig
> >> index 88df55d78d90..958dbc7347fa 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig
> >> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ config WWAN_HWSIM
> >>  	  called wwan_hwsim.  If unsure, say N.
> >>  
> >>  config MHI_WWAN_CTRL
> >> -	tristate "MHI WWAN control driver for QCOM-based PCIe modems"
> >> +	tristate "MHI WWAN control driver for Qualcomm-based PCIe modems"
> >>  	depends on MHI_BUS
> >>  	help
> >>  	  MHI WWAN CTRL allows QCOM-based PCIe modems to expose different modem
> > 
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > 
> > Sashiko points out that QCOM is still used on the line above.
> > 
> >> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ config MHI_WWAN_CTRL
> >>  	  called mhi_wwan_ctrl.
> >>  
> >>  config MHI_WWAN_MBIM
> >> -        tristate "MHI WWAN MBIM network driver for QCOM-based PCIe modems"
> >> +        tristate "MHI WWAN MBIM network driver for Qualcomm-based PCIe modems"
> >>          depends on MHI_BUS
> >>          help
> >>            MHI WWAN MBIM is a WWAN network driver for QCOM-based PCIe modems.
> > 
> > And here too.
> 
> Yes, I did not unify every single text because I believe that might be
> more churn and not that much benefit. I think it is more important to
> have a list of drivers in xconfig or menuconfig nicely organized and the
> help message matters less.
> 
> But if you wish, I can replace it there as well.

Thanks for clarifying.

I have no strong preference and am happy with this patch as-is.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email-masked]>

I see this was marked as changes requested.
Presumably due to my previous email.
Let's see if this helps.

pw-bot: under-review