Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 3/7] tls: Re-present partially-consumed records in tls_sw_read_sock()

From: Jakub Kicinski <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 18:24:40 -0700

On Tue, 12 May 2026 21:11:39 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote:
> > If so a more appropriate direction would be to say that in
> > the commit message and drop the Fixes tag.  
> 
> I’ll drop the Fixes: tag and route 2/7 and 3/7 through net-next.
> 
> Note that 7/7 in this series also bears a Fixes: tag. Should
> that one go through net instead?

That one looks like net material. Wouldn't be better off passing
bool copied into tls_rx_rec_wait() and calling sock_error()
conditionally than retroactively consume the error in the caller?