public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hejianet <hejianet@gmail•com>
To: Marcelo <marcelo.leitner@gmail•com>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger•kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, davem@davemloft•net,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2•inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei•org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6•org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash•net>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail•com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver•com>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet•com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor•apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:58:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22d87ec3-608f-fe41-5eb7-fe1104f133dd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160912185752.GB17689@localhost.localdomain>

Hi Marcelo


On 9/13/16 2:57 AM, Marcelo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:33:57PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
>> This is to use the generic interface snmp_get_cpu_field{,64}_batch to
>> aggregate the data by going through all the items of each cpu sequentially.
>> Then snmp_seq_show and netstat_seq_show are split into 2 parts to avoid build
>> warning "the frame size" larger than 1024 on s390.
> Yeah about that, did you test it with stack overflow detection?
> These arrays can be quite large.
>
> One more below..
Do you think it is acceptable if the stack usage is a little larger than 1024?
e.g. 1120
I can't find any other way to reduce the stack usage except use "static" before
unsigned long buff[TCP_MIB_MAX]

PS. sizeof buff is about TCP_MIB_MAX(116)*8=928
B.R.
>> Signed-off-by: Jia He <hejianet@gmail•com>
>> ---
>>   net/ipv4/proc.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>   1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/proc.c b/net/ipv4/proc.c
>> index 9f665b6..c6fc80e 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/proc.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/proc.c
>> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@
>>   #include <net/sock.h>
>>   #include <net/raw.h>
>>   
>> +#define TCPUDP_MIB_MAX max_t(u32, UDP_MIB_MAX, TCP_MIB_MAX)
>> +
>>   /*
>>    *	Report socket allocation statistics [mea@utu•fi]
>>    */
>> @@ -378,13 +380,15 @@ static void icmp_put(struct seq_file *seq)
>>   /*
>>    *	Called from the PROCfs module. This outputs /proc/net/snmp.
>>    */
>> -static int snmp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +static int snmp_seq_show_ipstats(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>>   {
>>   	int i;
>> +	u64 buff64[IPSTATS_MIB_MAX];
>>   	struct net *net = seq->private;
>>   
>> -	seq_puts(seq, "Ip: Forwarding DefaultTTL");
>> +	memset(buff64, 0, IPSTATS_MIB_MAX * sizeof(u64));
>>   
>> +	seq_puts(seq, "Ip: Forwarding DefaultTTL");
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_ipstats_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>>   		seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_ipstats_list[i].name);
>>   
>> @@ -393,57 +397,77 @@ static int snmp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>>   		   net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_default_ttl);
>>   
>>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, mibs) != 0);
>> +	snmp_get_cpu_field64_batch(buff64, snmp4_ipstats_list,
>> +				   net->mib.ip_statistics,
>> +				   offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_ipstats_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>> -		seq_printf(seq, " %llu",
>> -			   snmp_fold_field64(net->mib.ip_statistics,
>> -					     snmp4_ipstats_list[i].entry,
>> -					     offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp)));
>> +		seq_printf(seq, " %llu", buff64[i]);
>>   
>> -	icmp_put(seq);	/* RFC 2011 compatibility */
>> -	icmpmsg_put(seq);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int snmp_seq_show_tcp_udp(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	unsigned long buff[TCPUDP_MIB_MAX];
>> +	struct net *net = seq->private;
>> +
>> +	memset(buff, 0, TCPUDP_MIB_MAX * sizeof(unsigned long));
>>   
>>   	seq_puts(seq, "\nTcp:");
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_tcp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>>   		seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_tcp_list[i].name);
>>   
>>   	seq_puts(seq, "\nTcp:");
>> +	snmp_get_cpu_field_batch(buff, snmp4_tcp_list,
>> +				 net->mib.tcp_statistics);
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_tcp_list[i].name != NULL; i++) {
>>   		/* MaxConn field is signed, RFC 2012 */
>>   		if (snmp4_tcp_list[i].entry == TCP_MIB_MAXCONN)
>> -			seq_printf(seq, " %ld",
>> -				   snmp_fold_field(net->mib.tcp_statistics,
>> -						   snmp4_tcp_list[i].entry));
>> +			seq_printf(seq, " %ld", buff[i]);
>>   		else
>> -			seq_printf(seq, " %lu",
>> -				   snmp_fold_field(net->mib.tcp_statistics,
>> -						   snmp4_tcp_list[i].entry));
>> +			seq_printf(seq, " %lu", buff[i]);
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	memset(buff, 0, TCPUDP_MIB_MAX * sizeof(unsigned long));
>> +
>> +	snmp_get_cpu_field_batch(buff, snmp4_udp_list,
>> +				 net->mib.udp_statistics);
>>   	seq_puts(seq, "\nUdp:");
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_udp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>>   		seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_udp_list[i].name);
>> -
>>   	seq_puts(seq, "\nUdp:");
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_udp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>> -		seq_printf(seq, " %lu",
>> -			   snmp_fold_field(net->mib.udp_statistics,
>> -					   snmp4_udp_list[i].entry));
>> +		seq_printf(seq, " %lu", buff[i]);
>> +
>> +	memset(buff, 0, TCPUDP_MIB_MAX * sizeof(unsigned long));
>>   
>>   	/* the UDP and UDP-Lite MIBs are the same */
>>   	seq_puts(seq, "\nUdpLite:");
>> +	snmp_get_cpu_field_batch(buff, snmp4_udp_list,
>> +				 net->mib.udplite_statistics);
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_udp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>>   		seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_udp_list[i].name);
>> -
>>   	seq_puts(seq, "\nUdpLite:");
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_udp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>> -		seq_printf(seq, " %lu",
>> -			   snmp_fold_field(net->mib.udplite_statistics,
>> -					   snmp4_udp_list[i].entry));
>> +		seq_printf(seq, " %lu", buff[i]);
>>   
>>   	seq_putc(seq, '\n');
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int snmp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +{
>> +	snmp_seq_show_ipstats(seq, v);
>> +
>> +	icmp_put(seq);	/* RFC 2011 compatibility */
>> +	icmpmsg_put(seq);
>> +
>> +	snmp_seq_show_tcp_udp(seq, v);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int snmp_seq_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>>   {
>>   	return single_open_net(inode, file, snmp_seq_show);
>> @@ -457,41 +481,59 @@ static const struct file_operations snmp_seq_fops = {
>>   	.release = single_release_net,
>>   };
>>   
>> -
>> -
>>   /*
>>    *	Output /proc/net/netstat
>>    */
>> -static int netstat_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +static int netstat_seq_show_tcpext(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>>   {
>>   	int i;
>> +	unsigned long buff[LINUX_MIB_MAX];
>>   	struct net *net = seq->private;
>>   
>> +	memset(buff, 0, sizeof(unsigned long) * LINUX_MIB_MAX);
>> +
>>   	seq_puts(seq, "TcpExt:");
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_net_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>>   		seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_net_list[i].name);
>>   
>>   	seq_puts(seq, "\nTcpExt:");
>> +	snmp_get_cpu_field_batch(buff, snmp4_net_list,
>> +				 net->mib.net_statistics);
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_net_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>> -		seq_printf(seq, " %lu",
>> -			   snmp_fold_field(net->mib.net_statistics,
>> -					   snmp4_net_list[i].entry));
>> +		seq_printf(seq, " %lu", buff[i]);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int netstat_seq_show_ipext(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	u64 buff64[IPSTATS_MIB_MAX];
>> +	struct net *net = seq->private;
>>   
>>   	seq_puts(seq, "\nIpExt:");
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_ipextstats_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>>   		seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_ipextstats_list[i].name);
>>   
>>   	seq_puts(seq, "\nIpExt:");
> You're missing a memset() call here.
>
>> +	snmp_get_cpu_field64_batch(buff64, snmp4_ipextstats_list,
>> +				   net->mib.ip_statistics,
>> +				   offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
>>   	for (i = 0; snmp4_ipextstats_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
>> -		seq_printf(seq, " %llu",
>> -			   snmp_fold_field64(net->mib.ip_statistics,
>> -					     snmp4_ipextstats_list[i].entry,
>> -					     offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp)));
>> +		seq_printf(seq, " %llu", buff64[i]);
>>   
>>   	seq_putc(seq, '\n');
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int netstat_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +{
>> +	netstat_seq_show_tcpext(seq, v);
>> +	netstat_seq_show_ipext(seq, v);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int netstat_seq_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>>   {
>>   	return single_open_net(inode, file, netstat_seq_show);
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger•kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-14  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-09  6:33 [RFC PATCH v3 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field Jia He
2016-09-09  6:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/7] net:snmp: Introduce generic batch interfaces for snmp_get_cpu_field{,64} Jia He
2016-09-09  6:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-12 18:57   ` Marcelo
2016-09-14  3:10     ` hejianet
2016-09-14  5:58     ` hejianet [this message]
2016-09-14 11:55       ` Marcelo
2016-09-21 16:18         ` hejianet
2016-09-21 18:24           ` Marcelo
2016-09-22  5:38             ` hejianet
2016-09-09  6:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp6_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-12 19:05   ` Marcelo
2016-09-14  3:11     ` hejianet
2016-09-09  6:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in sctp_snmp_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-09  6:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in xfrm_statistics_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-09  6:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/7] ipv6: Remove useless parameter in __snmp6_fill_statsdev Jia He
2016-09-09  6:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/7] net: Suppress the "Comparison to NULL could be written" warning Jia He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22d87ec3-608f-fe41-5eb7-fe1104f133dd@gmail.com \
    --to=hejianet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor$(echo .)apana.org.au \
    --cc=jmorris@namei$(echo .)org \
    --cc=kaber@trash$(echo .)net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2$(echo .)inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver$(echo .)com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet$(echo .)com \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox