Subject: Re: [PATCH next 4/6] bonding: Allow userspace to set system_priority

From: Jay Vosburgh <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 23:05:17 -0800

Mahesh Bandewar <[email-masked]> wrote:
[...]
>Actually I was thinking of making ad_actor_sysprio instead of making
>ad_user_port_key (feels like having more underscores makes it
>unnecessary longer). That way all three look similar. So
>
>         ad_actor_sysprio
>         ad_actor_system
>         ad_user_portkey
>
>All carry the same theme of meaning. Otherwise we could do something like -
>
>         ad_actor_sys_prio
>         ad_actor_sys_mac
>         ad_user_port_key
>
>Which one seems more logical / reasonable?

	FWIW, I would go with ad_actor_sys_prio, ad_actor_system and
ad_user_port_key.  The first two then mimic the terms from the standard,
and the "user" one is part of the Actor_Admin_Port_Key from the
standard, so it follows the same sort of naming.

	-J

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, [email-masked]