Subject: Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]

From: Felix Radensky <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:30:49 +0300

Then maybe it makes sense to enable e100 by default and not eepro100 ?

Felix. 

Jeff Garzik wrote:

>  
>
>My Official Story(tm) is currently
>
>* use e100
>* unless you really really want to use eepro100
>
>eepro100 in the kernel tree is essentially unmaintained.  One of the
>big reasons I merged e100 is that it has an active maintainer with
>full access to docs.
>
>	Jeff
>
>
>
>
>  
>