Subject: Re: e100 "Ferguson" release

From: Jeff Garzik <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 02:12:49 -0400

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> * (extremely minor) some people (like me :)) consider dead reads like 
> the readb() call in e100_write_flush

er, that was a bit incomplete.

completing:

  ... needing to be marked explicitly with a "(void) " prefix, 
indicating it is intentionally a dead read.

Maintainer's call, ultimately, though...