Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3 v4] drivers: net: ethernet: qualcomm: rmnet: Initial implementation

From: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:46:48 -0600

>> +struct rmnet_phys_ep_conf_s {
> 
> The name is cryptic. Why "_s"?
>> +
>> +struct rmnet_vnd_private_s {
> 
> Again, cryptic.
> 
> 
>> +	struct rmnet_logical_ep_conf_s local_ep;
>> +	u32 msg_enable;
>> +};

Hi Jiri

The _s was to indicate struct. I'll remove that.

>> +rx_handler_result_t rmnet_ingress_handler(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> +	struct rmnet_phys_ep_conf_s *config;
> 
> I still fail to understand why the name of this is "config". Please
> change to something else across whole code. Including the name of the 
> struct.
> 
>> +	struct net_device *dev;
>> +	int rc;
>> +
>> +	if (!skb)
>> +		return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
>> +
>> +	dev = skb->dev;
>> +	config = rmnet_get_phys_ep_config(skb->dev);
> 
> You have dev. Why not use dev?
> 
>> +rx_handler_result_t rmnet_rx_handler(struct sk_buff **pskb)
>> +{
>> +	return rmnet_ingress_handler(*pskb);
> 
> This is just silly. Why you don't have the content of 
> rmnet_ingress_handler
> right here?

I'll make these changes now.