Subject: Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here...

From: Chris Friesen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:42:51 -0400

[email-masked] wrote:

> Nevertheless, number of packets to kill the session is still *large* 
> (under "best-case" for attacker, you need to send 2^30 packets)...

I though the whole point of this vulnerability was that you "only" needed to send 64K packets, not 2^30.

Chris